We all know how crazy the fees are in Ethereum. No need to regurgitate everything we already know. It is evident that Ethereum is limited on throughput, yet established projects aren’t moving away. Judging from present events, intensive dApps are ready to port over to scaling solutions but still root back to the mainnet. Therefore, the prospects of them moving out and establishing themselves elsewhere looks slim to none.
It's really nice that someone is trying to develop etherium, I'm sure after 2.0 is released, the number of etherium users will increase exponentially. In the meantime, I recommend you to watch the American Gangster movie you gave as an example. It's a really impressive and heartwarming movie.
Etherum is now a brand. It is many times superior to other coins.
Its beauty, the number of users and the fact that it is the first provide this.
Of course, the fees are too high. People want to trade at a low fee. Is this going to be a solvable problem?
I've had that question in my head for two days. Eth is very expensive because the user is very expensive. What if the fee goes down? Can a lot more users destroy it?
Actually, it would be best to see it done. But it'll keep you waiting.
Arbitrum sounds nice as Optimism does (Paragism mentioned about Optimism 4 days ago). Tbh the article was difficult to understand, and I barely understood the concept of Arbitrum.
I like that it bulks up the transactions and it decreases the amount of fees. Moreover, I did a little search and read that Arbitrum Rollup stores less data on chain rather than other Rollups chains which helps the transactions go through easily.
In terms of security, if you think in that perspective we cannot trust on any application on blockchain. If Arbitrum can run away or lock the value on their chain so can Uniswap or Sushiwap.
For me doesn't matter Arbitrum or Optimism, I want to involve in ETH network, and due to the high amount of fees I can't do that. Whichever protocol has sustainability will solve the problem in advance. Hopefully every blockchain user will be able to use ETH in short period of time.
As I said in the article about Optimism on September 10, we don't need to mention that the ETH fees are high. It's a fact. Can it change? Why not. Optimism, and apparently Arbitrum, seem to be nice steps on this way. I hope there will be more projects like this and more people can freely use the ETH network without fear of high fees.
Sure makes you wonder about the benefits of solutions like this. Seems like you are really losing some benefits of eth or even a l2 by using something like arbitrum.
It's really nice that someone is trying to develop etherium, I'm sure after 2.0 is released, the number of etherium users will increase exponentially. In the meantime, I recommend you to watch the American Gangster movie you gave as an example. It's a really impressive and heartwarming movie.
You've explained it nicely. The Ethereum network is a very well functioning network. I love his work.
But when I look at a network, I look at its speed and fee. So I don't arbitrarily use the Ethereum network. If I have to I'll use it.
Because my actions are small. If I had invested millions of dollars, I would have preferred the Ethereum network.
Ethereum is a really great brand and privilege. But the fees are annoying.
Thanks for the good article. A lot of things I'm curious about have answers. Thanks again.
Yes you are right.
Etherum is now a brand. It is many times superior to other coins.
Its beauty, the number of users and the fact that it is the first provide this.
Of course, the fees are too high. People want to trade at a low fee. Is this going to be a solvable problem?
I've had that question in my head for two days. Eth is very expensive because the user is very expensive. What if the fee goes down? Can a lot more users destroy it?
Actually, it would be best to see it done. But it'll keep you waiting.
Thanks for the article.
Have a nice day.
Thank you for your article.
I read a topic that I was completely unfamiliar with.
and now i will do some research to find out some more.
Arbitrum sounds nice as Optimism does (Paragism mentioned about Optimism 4 days ago). Tbh the article was difficult to understand, and I barely understood the concept of Arbitrum.
I like that it bulks up the transactions and it decreases the amount of fees. Moreover, I did a little search and read that Arbitrum Rollup stores less data on chain rather than other Rollups chains which helps the transactions go through easily.
In terms of security, if you think in that perspective we cannot trust on any application on blockchain. If Arbitrum can run away or lock the value on their chain so can Uniswap or Sushiwap.
For me doesn't matter Arbitrum or Optimism, I want to involve in ETH network, and due to the high amount of fees I can't do that. Whichever protocol has sustainability will solve the problem in advance. Hopefully every blockchain user will be able to use ETH in short period of time.
As I said in the article about Optimism on September 10, we don't need to mention that the ETH fees are high. It's a fact. Can it change? Why not. Optimism, and apparently Arbitrum, seem to be nice steps on this way. I hope there will be more projects like this and more people can freely use the ETH network without fear of high fees.
Thanks for the article.
Is L2 really the way to go? Shouldn't the network be able to handle everything?
Sure makes you wonder about the benefits of solutions like this. Seems like you are really losing some benefits of eth or even a l2 by using something like arbitrum.
Nice read Dalmas. Thanks.